Robert Doyel is worried in regards to the babies born to single parents – so worried, the truth is, that he’s written a book regarding the problem. His perspective is undoubtedly an unusual one: He spent 16 years like a Florida judge, mostly in family court, where he was linked to more than 15,000 restraining order cases, and also thousands of dependency, custody, and paternity cases.

What worries him a lot, he states, is the fact that “there isn’t any concerted effort anywhere even going to report on the situation, not to say try to change it.” His concerns about “the prevalence of unwed births and identifying problems they cause” led him to publish The Baby Mama Syndrome (Lake Cannon Press).

This book is undoubtedly an eye-opener, studying the problem of the “fragile families” from multiple angles, including the difficulties of abuse, neglect, and violence. Social workers, teachers, physicians, nurses, along with other professionals who handle these children in addition to their parents will probably be interested in the sheer sized the problem (1.six million babies every year) along with the demographic data with this book.

Doyel notes how the birthrate for teens has been creeping down for many years, however the numbers continue to be daunting: In 2014, about a quarter of an million babies were born to girls 19 and under. There were 2771 births to girls under 15, and most of those young mothers were unmarried.

Despite the widespread assumption that almost all of these single parents are black, statistics show unmarried white mothers develop the most babies, as well as Hispanics and after that blacks.

His thoughtful and well-researched book makes an important contribution to your national discussion about these babies, their mothers, and what goes on as the children become adults and – all too-often – repeat the syndrome. Three top features of the book are particularly impressive.

Case Studies

This book offers many cases studies grouped in patterns: female rivals, fathers married to a new woman, mothers married to a new man, lesbian couples, plus more – for example. There are also triangles, rectangles, and serial troublemakers. One chapter works with a complex pattern that Doyel calls “Baby Mama and Boyfriend vs. Baby Daddy and Husband.”

Reading throughout the permutations and complications makes a picture of the issue that mere data cannot provide – as well as opens a window in the causes. “Baby mamas” threaten and attack rival females who have had multiple babies with the same “baby daddy.” Married females and “baby mamas” battle more than a “baby daddy” who’s fathered their children.

Readers gradually familiarize yourself with the reasons why these women keep having babies by men who won’t marry or support them: Jealousy, poor impulse control, unrestrained sexuality, as well as an inability to get a grip on their lives and futures. The real victims, needless to say, are their children.

Whenever it truly is proven that the innocent person was wrongfully convicted, which occurs considerably more frequently than anybody would like to admit, we have been quick to pin the culprit on some evil authority figure. According to Mark Godsey, an early prosecutor now heading the Ohio Innocence Project, there is absolutely no such sinister antagonist, only humans behaving as humans.

In his new book Blind Injustice, Godsey besides explains how and wrongful convictions occur, but provides some not hard, inexpensive strategies to greatly reduce these tragic cases. Because he served ages as a prosecutor in New York, Godsey is able to empathize together with the courts while to also sympathize using the victims of wrongful imprisonment.

Most people upon discovering someone like Ricky Jackson, who served nearly 40 years in a prison in Ohio for the crime he wouldn’t commit, feel regret for just a few seconds without ever thinking this type of travesty could someday affect them, too. However, over two thousands convictions are actually overturned by evidence like DNA testing since 1989.

The advantages for so many tragic miscarriages of justice are primarily psychological and political, good book. Prosecutors, as well as judges and juries for instance, are individuals and thus vulnerable to error.

Among such errors, Godsey contends, are blond denial, blind bias, and blind memory, all which can be the only so-called evidence a prosecutor uses as part of his effort to secure a conviction up against the accused. The book offers various tests, as both versions I failed, to say just how unreliable the three of those concepts might be when determining truth.

Political factors also give rise to many of the false imprisonments, especially as many judges and prosecutors are elected positions. The public quite naturally really wants to feel safe, so candidates who’ve reputations or agendas that not receive the highest vote totals.

Thus, a lot more convictions a prosecutor can amass, the higher quality his chances to retain his position. Instead of asking what number of innocent people he may have caused to get incarcerated, society asks approximately the number whether or not they were guilty or otherwise.

Godsey, due to his long service to be a prosecutor in New York, understands these factors. There is tremendous pressure on legal authorities to make justice without delay to a below patient public. Perhaps that’s the reason everyone, not merely law students and loved ones of victims of injustice, should read Blind Injustice.